Mrinalini Mukherjee Foundation
Skip to main content
  • Menu
  • Mukherjees
  • Archives
  • Foundation
  • Support
  • Events
  • News
  • Contact
Menu
  • Studio Practice, Explorations into the studio that became the archive
    Mrinalini Mukehrjee engrossed in her workspace in New Friends Colony, New Delhi, 1985

    Studio Practice

    Explorations into the studio that became the archive
    How does one place an artist beyond the physical mapping of their studio? Where does a practice begin or end when it travels across cities, materials, relationships, and decades? What can the remains of a studio—photograph slides, negatives, contact sheets, letters, and lists—tell us about a process that was never fully visible to begin with? What if the archive becomes a studio of its own—where process continues not through making, but through remembering, reframing, and re-reading what was left behind?
  • With  Studio Practice, we enter the archives in search of the studio of Mrinalini Mukherjee. This exhibition, the first of many that explore the collections in the Mrinalini Mukherjee Foundation Archive, becomes a way of moving with the artist through the places she worked, the artists she encountered, the residencies and institutions she engaged with, and the works that emerged in between. In doing so, we begin to see the archive not only as a site of retrospection but as a space of return where process, memory, and material remain active and where Mukherjee’s legacy continues to unfold, shaped as much by her world as by those who now encounter it anew.  

     

    An artist's practice is often inseparable from the sphere it emerges from—the world of materials, processes, influences, and relationships centered in and around a studio. For Mrinalini Mukherjee, the studio appears, through the traces in her archive, not simply as a space of art making, but as a realm she continually pushed and stretched to meet the shifting demands of her expansive practice. It held not only the scale and complexity of her sculptures, but also the eclectic materials, foraged objects, and references she gathered around her; whether tools, textures, or fragments that fed into her evolving forms. In these images and records, we glimpse a space that was continuously adapted, improvised, and reimagined. Perhaps the studio lives on not only in what it held, but in how it enabled her to work, think, and experiment, offering the possibility to read it anew with each encounter. Through the archives, its resonance extends far beyond its once physical walls, inviting fresh interpretations of the spaces she moulded, and of Mrinalini Mukherjee herself, as an artist, collaborator, and individual deeply rooted in the practice she fervently pursued.

     

    The Mrinalini Mukherjee Foundation’s Archive houses a remarkable collection of over 2,380 records, documenting Mrinalini’s pioneering career as one of India’s most significant sculptors. The physical archive offers a closer glimpse into her life and practice, encompassing photo documentation of her monumental fiber, ceramic, and bronze sculptures, detailed installation instructions, and other works that illuminate her creative process. The archive also opens windows into her personal and professional realms—letters exchanged with peers like Bhupen Khakhar and Nilima Sheikh, travel photographs with her architect husband Ranjit Singh, and a treasure trove of documents related to her parents, legendary artists Benode Behari Mukherjee and Leela Mukherjee.

  • The archive is by no definition static. It is a sustained extension of her studio practice, constantly offering new insights... The archive is by no definition static. It is a sustained extension of her studio practice, constantly offering new insights... The archive is by no definition static. It is a sustained extension of her studio practice, constantly offering new insights... The archive is by no definition static. It is a sustained extension of her studio practice, constantly offering new insights... The archive is by no definition static. It is a sustained extension of her studio practice, constantly offering new insights... The archive is by no definition static. It is a sustained extension of her studio practice, constantly offering new insights... The archive is by no definition static. It is a sustained extension of her studio practice, constantly offering new insights... The archive is by no definition static. It is a sustained extension of her studio practice, constantly offering new insights...

    The archive is by no definition static. It is a sustained extension of her studio practice, constantly offering new insights as it now unfolds in digital form. From early childhood photographs found in Leela Mukherjee’s collection and candid glimpses of student life in Baroda, to detailed installation notes for her fiber sculptures, personal correspondences, and press clippings—these materials form the core of this archive, giving us layered entry points into Mukherjee’s artistic process, contextual influences, and everyday engagements. More than an act of safeguarding Mukherjee’s legacy, the archive becomes a way of reimagining the memory of an artist's workplace through the objects and stories left behind, in this newly curated virtual space.

     

    When a studio becomes an archive, it reveals itself in new ways—both through what remains and the structures we impose to make sense of it. It is tempting to recall Andy Warhol’s Time Capsules, where the act of preservation of seemingly mundane letters, photobooth photos, and newspaper snippets creates a new lens through which to understand an artist’s world. While Mukherjee’s archive was never conceived as such an intentional accumulation, its fragments now suggest new narratives, offering fresh insights.

  • The digital archive offers a way to experience Mukherjee’s practice as a multifaceted journey, shifting between materials and methods: from rope to bronze, botanical forms to architectural scale, folk to contemporary vocabularies, resisting any singular interpretation. It is from this oeuvre, a vast array of objects has surfaced —be it the letters, postcards, travel artifacts, photographs, negatives, contact sheets, books, and other material objects, each carrying its own context and narrative. Over the past few years, these fragments have been carefully cataloged and digitized, gaining new layers of meaning and purpose within the ever-expanding realm of ideas and interpretations in the art world.

     

    Thus, the notion of the studio persists as a space that continually shifts, expands, and redefines itself. Through Studio Practice, we invite you to examine what a studio looks like when pieced together through images and documents. The stories that emerge when materials, tools, and traces of process are reassembled and drawn back to life. Discover from over 240 personal records, 350 correspondences, a vibrant collection of postcards, and hundreds of various ephemeras and publications in our repository— how personal and public histories intersect when the boundaries of the studio dissolve, as memories and materials blend with the traces of life and thought and Mukherjee's enduring legacy continues to evolve.


    Welcome to the archives of Mrinalini Mukherjee.

     
  • From Barsati to Garhi From Barsati to Garhi From Barsati to Garhi From Barsati to Garhi From Barsati to Garhi From Barsati to Garhi From Barsati to Garhi From Barsati to Garhi From Barsati to Garhi From Barsati to Garhi From Barsati to Garhi

    From Barsati to Garhi

    Studios imprint the joy of labor, anchoring materials in specific sites that shape them. For Mrinalini Mukherjee, whose work constantly negotiated scale, complexity, and transformation across fiber, ceramic, and bronze, the studio was never a fixed entity. Instead, it evolved alongside her practice, adapting to new materials, shifting locations, and expanding ambitions.

     

    From her barsati in Nizamuddin East, where she experimented with fiber sculptures under the open sky and threw exuberant parties entertaining friends, to makeshift basement studios and ad hoc garage spaces in Delhi that accommodated her growing commissions, and later to the more structured communal environment of the Garhi Studios-- each space was integral to her creative evolution. 

     

    This exhibition traces her journey across studios in Delhi through the various documents in her studio. Follow along with us the many spaces she inhabited, exploring how each studio shaped her process and bore witness to her practice.

     
  • The Barsati Studio

    Contact sheet of stills from the Barsati studio.

    At the age of 21, after completing her studies in Fine Arts in Baroda, young Mrinalini chose to relocate to Nizamuddin East, New Delhi in 1972, where she began to establish herself as a bold, independent sculptor. Mukherjee’s first independent studio in Delhi was the barsati or the rooftop room of her rented house in Nizamuddin East. This space became both a site of creation and a social hub, where she engaged with Delhi’s community of architects, designers, artists, and journalists.

     

    The terrace acted as an extension of the studio, working through her early commisions and allowing her to suspend and test the scale of her fiber sculptures in natural light. 

    In images from these years, the familiar dome of Humayun’s Tomb can often be spotted just beyond the terrace, quietly anchoring Mrinalini’s early experiments within the unfolding cityscape of Delhi. 

    • A young 'Dillu' as Mrinalini Mukherjee was affectionately called by friends and family, captured in her early twenties seating in her newly rented barsati and on the cusp of an artistic journey that would span decades.

      A young 'Dillu' as Mrinalini Mukherjee was affectionately called by friends and family, captured in her early twenties seating in her newly rented barsati and on the cusp of an artistic journey that would span decades. 

    • A snapshot of the vacant Barsati terrace, holding only light and memory.

      A snapshot of the vacant Barsati terrace, holding only light and memory.

    • Mukherjee's older work titled Tentacles captured in a B&W Negative, as it unfurls its sinuous form in the terrace studio, 1976–77.

      Mukherjee's older work titled Tentacles captured in a B&W Negative, as it unfurls its sinuous form in the terrace studio, 1976–77.

    • A moment shared between Mrinalini and Ranjit Singh, her then-husband and creative collaborator in their barsati,1980s. Together in their old car, Singh and Mukherjee traveled extensively from Ladakh to Nepal to Orissa to Rajasthan, traversing through diverse terrains and cultures. As an accomplice, Singh also documented Mukherjee's evolving sculptural language, often staging and photographing works within this shared space.

      A moment shared between Mrinalini and Ranjit Singh, her then-husband and creative collaborator in their barsati,1980s. Together in their old car, Singh and Mukherjee traveled extensively from Ladakh to Nepal to Orissa to Rajasthan, traversing through diverse terrains and cultures. As an accomplice, Singh also documented Mukherjee's evolving sculptural language, often staging and photographing works within this shared space. 

    • An unnamed work from early 1970s with sprout-like forms, set against the backdrop on the Barsati terrace, captured in a positive scan.

      An unnamed work from early 1970s with sprout-like forms, set against the backdrop on the Barsati terrace, captured in a positive scan.

    • A portrait of Mrinalni Mukherjee before the studios, the sculptures, and the worlds she would build with her hands.

      A portrait of Mrinalni Mukherjee before the studios, the sculptures, and the worlds she would build with her hands.

    • A letter addressed to the Nizamuddin household of Mrinalini and Ranjit Singh in praises of the studio’s ambience and social life. The barsati was more than just a studio—it was a lively gathering space for artists, architects, and writers, where friendships and creative exchanges extended beyond borders. The sender reminisces about time spent in Delhi.

      A letter addressed to the Nizamuddin household of Mrinalini and Ranjit Singh in praises of the studio’s ambience and social life. The barsati was more than just a studio—it was a lively gathering space for artists, architects, and writers, where friendships and creative exchanges extended beyond borders. The sender reminisces about time spent in Delhi.

    • A slide offering a close up, detailed shot of one of Mukherjee's earlier hemp works, Sapling in progress, 1973-74.

      A slide offering a close up, detailed shot of one of Mukherjee's earlier hemp works, Sapling in progress, 1973-74.

    • A contact sheet that captured the evolution of Devi on Mukherjee’s Nizamuddin terrace. The sequential images not only follow the sculpture’s formation but also capture the studio’s lived-in atmosphere—trees in the periphery, visitors passing through, a cooler humming nearby.

      A contact sheet that captured the evolution of Devi on Mukherjee’s Nizamuddin terrace. The sequential images not only follow the sculpture’s formation but also capture the studio’s lived-in atmosphere—trees in the periphery, visitors passing through, a cooler humming nearby.

       

  • THE BASEMENT STUDIO

     Pushp in process at Khirki Studio, 1993.

     

    In 1976, Mukherjee received a commission for a large-scale mural at the Mahatma Gandhi Institute in Mauritius. This project required a different kind of studio—one that could accommodate a work of significant scale. She rented a basement studio in Khirki where she could lay out, construct, and refine her massive compositions.
     
    To bring the project to life, she enlisted daily-wage laborers from Bhopal, who were skilled in stringing charpais (woven rope beds). Their technique of interlacing rope with precision mirrored elements of Mukherjee’s fiber work, reinforcing the link between traditional craftsmanship and her sculptural language.

     

    “The guiding principle was the image she had in mind... She would start work in a small room without worrying whether it could be taken out from there. Sometimes, we had to remove the door and its frame just to get the work out—she refused to be restricted.”
    — Ranjit Singh in correspondence with Shanay Jhaveri, Phenomenal Forces of Nature 2019

     

  • Mrinalini with Budhia, who assisted Mrinalini for years loyally with her sculptures- in preparing and dying strands of wholesale bought hemp, sunn or sisal, and also in the actual knotting and weaving over the years. (View more details about this item in a popup).
    A telegram correspondance from the Mahatma Gandhi Institute offering last minute directions and logistical updates. More than an instruction, this archival record highlights Mukherjee's engagements beyond the confines of a typical studio - through institutional negotiations and labour involving spatial and geographical demands. (View more details about this item in a popup).
    Mukherjee worked with local artisans, bridging traditional craft techniques with her sculptural form. (View more details about this item in a popup).
    From stringing charpais to knotting murals for Mukherjee. (View more details about this item in a popup).
    Crafting, knotting, and interlacing. (View more details about this item in a popup).
    "Tough old Budhia, wrinkled but resplendent in her Rajasthani ensemble of ghagra and dupatta and the formidable Mrinalini were quite a pair", Nilima Sheikh, 'Ruse for wonderment', in Transfigurations. (View more details about this item in a popup).
    Daily-wage laborers from Bhopal helped Mrinalini in weaving fibers within the basement studio. (View more details about this item in a popup).
    Mural work in progress. (View more details about this item in a popup).
    Work in progress as the large scale mural unfolds in the basement, adapting to the scale of the project for the Mahatma Gandhi Institute in Mauritius, 1976. (View more details about this item in a popup).

    Mrinalini with Budhia, who assisted Mrinalini for years loyally with her sculptures- in preparing and dying strands of wholesale bought hemp, sunn or sisal, and also in the actual knotting and weaving over the years.

  • Khirki Studio Experiments
    • Fibre work remnants from Khirki studio.

      Fibre work remnants from Khirki studio.

    • Mm 29 Artiststudio Khirki 2
    • Mm 29 Artiststudio Khirki 12
    • Mm 29 Artiststudio Khirki 18
  • Photographs from Mukherjee’s early studios, particularly the Barsati and later Khirki, capture her not only in the process of art-making but in moments of post-production, as she consciously experimented with how her sculptures might be seen, encountered, and experienced.She installed and suspended her works, playing with their spatial presence within the constrained studios. There is a sense of deliberate staging in these images: the floors are swept, the spaces cleared, the sculptures composed with care for the camera. These studios became immersive environments- precursors to the gallery- wherein Mukherjee intuitively choreographed how her work would be perceived. Through her own lens, and that of her husband Ranjit Singh, Mrinalini staged and documented  the acts of tying knots, adjusting light, and framing—each an experiment in viewership, an exercise in evoking awe through arrangement and atmosphere. Hundreds of contact sheets and negatives reveal how she turned to photography to simulate the viewer’s gaze and study her forms from multiple angles.  In these images, one sees a deep awareness not only of material, but of its eventual reception with each installation experimnt an intimate rehearsal in exhibition-making.

     

     
  • Contact sheets showing Vriksh Nata, work in progress, Khirki Studio, 1991-92.
  • THE GARAGE STUDIO

    For her British Council show in the 1980s, Mukherjee transformed a garage in New Friends Colony into her workspace. Unlike the openness of the barsati, this space was more enclosed, allowing her to control lighting and texture while focusing on developing intricate surface treatments on her fiber sculptures.

     

    Photographs from 1985 show the garage studio filled with her towering fiber sculptures, floating mid-air as if frozen in motion. The density of hemp made these works physically demanding—some weighing close to a hundred kilos. Mukherjee often spoke of sculpting as an intense, almost combative process, where her own body was fully engaged in shaping, knotting, and maneuvering the material into form. The garage provided a contained space for this labor, allowing her to push the material to its limits while refining its texture and presence.

     

    Assortment of images from the garage exhibition shows Mrinalini Mukherjee posed at work, as the sculptures Devi, Pakshi, and Yakshi suspended and photographed from multiple angles,  all come together in the garage-turned-studio. 

    • Mm Ngavt 009 004
    • Mm Studiophotograph 1985 003
    • Mm Studiophotograph 1985 002
    • Mm Studiophotograph 1985 004
    • Mm 464 Mix Artwork 79
    • Mm 464 Mix Artwork 84
    • Mm Garage Exhibition 012
    • Mm Studiophotograph 1985 001
    • Mm Ngavt 009 010
    • Mm 461 Studio 015
    • Mm Garage Exhibition 008
    • Mm 212 Large Slide Studio Shot
  • A letter from Nilima and Gulammohammed Sheikh wherein among other things Dillu is congratulated for the opening of the show and appreciated for how the garage turned out to be. The couple were longtime mentors and friends from Mukherjee's Baroda days and remained an important voice of support throughout her career. (View more details about this item in a popup).
    (View more details about this item in a popup).
    A letter from Nilima and Gulammohammed Sheikh wherein among other things Dillu is congratulated for the opening of the show and appreciated for how the garage turned out to be. The couple were longtime mentors and friends from Mukherjee's Baroda days and remained an important voice of support throughout her career. (View more details about this item in a popup).
    (View more details about this item in a popup).

    A letter from Nilima and Gulammohammed Sheikh wherein among other things Dillu is congratulated for the opening of the show and appreciated for how the garage turned out to be. The couple were longtime mentors and friends from Mukherjee's Baroda days and remained an important voice of support throughout her career.

  • The Garhi Studios The Garhi Studios The Garhi Studios The Garhi Studios The Garhi Studios The Garhi Studios The Garhi Studios The Garhi Studios

    The Garhi Studios

    By the 1980s, Mrinalini Mukherjee moved her practice to Garhi Studios in New Delhi, a multidisciplinary art space established in 1976 by the Lalit Kala Akademi. Designed as an affordable, communal studio complex, it was called Kala Kuteer- to meet the needs of practising artists. Garhi housed artists working across various media—primarily in printmaking, sculpture, and ceramics—with the aim of cultivating an environment of cross-disciplinary exchange among artists.

    Following her residency at the European Ceramic Workcentre in the Netherlands in 1996, where she first began working seriously with clay, she returned to Delhi with a renewed interest in ceramics.  Unlike the informal, adaptable spaces of her earlier studios, Garhi’s structured environment and access to kilns and shared artist networks allowed for such creative experiements. Garhi provided Mukherjee with the space and facilities to expand her material explorations beyond fiber. Here, she engaged deeply with ceramics, experimenting with glazing techniques and surface textures that would later inform her bronze sculptures. While she continued working with fiber well into the 2000s, the 1990s marked a shift in her material vocabulary.


    Thus at Garhi, her engagement with material deepened—while fiber was pliant and organic, ceramic and bronze demanded a different kinds of manipulation and control. Yet, her approach remained consistent in responding intuitively to form, volume, and material resistance.

  • The Burari Foundry By the late 1990s, Mukherjee turned to the Burari Foundry in Delhi, a family-run studio led by... The Burari Foundry By the late 1990s, Mukherjee turned to the Burari Foundry in Delhi, a family-run studio led by... The Burari Foundry By the late 1990s, Mukherjee turned to the Burari Foundry in Delhi, a family-run studio led by... The Burari Foundry By the late 1990s, Mukherjee turned to the Burari Foundry in Delhi, a family-run studio led by... The Burari Foundry By the late 1990s, Mukherjee turned to the Burari Foundry in Delhi, a family-run studio led by... The Burari Foundry By the late 1990s, Mukherjee turned to the Burari Foundry in Delhi, a family-run studio led by... The Burari Foundry By the late 1990s, Mukherjee turned to the Burari Foundry in Delhi, a family-run studio led by... The Burari Foundry By the late 1990s, Mukherjee turned to the Burari Foundry in Delhi, a family-run studio led by... The Burari Foundry By the late 1990s, Mukherjee turned to the Burari Foundry in Delhi, a family-run studio led by... The Burari Foundry By the late 1990s, Mukherjee turned to the Burari Foundry in Delhi, a family-run studio led by... The Burari Foundry By the late 1990s, Mukherjee turned to the Burari Foundry in Delhi, a family-run studio led by...
    The Burari Foundry

    By the late 1990s, Mukherjee turned to the Burari Foundry in Delhi, a family-run studio led by sculptor-casters Balkrishna and Pankaj Guru, as a space to realise her ambitious bronze works. Having spent over a decade working with ceramics, she was now confident in the process of casting, welding, and fusing metal to create fluid, organic forms. Unlike the yielding nature of fiber or the fragility of clay, bronze introduced new challenges—rigid yet malleable under heat, requiring meticulous planning yet allowing for unexpected transformations. She developed a distinct working rhythm here, to the extent of fashioning her own tools from an orthodontist’s toolkit to manipulate her forms with precision. Though not her personal studio, Burari Foundry became a vital site of collaboration as casting required a team, and Mukherjee enlisted the help of Pankaj Guru and his team to bring her visions to life.

     

    Burari became one of her final workspaces, where she worked with unwavering dedication. Here, her sculptures took on their most enduring form—solid yet full of energy without having a figural aspect.  A lasting statement to her lifelong dialogue with material and process.

     Photo credits to Anna Tully and Mrinalini Mukherjee Foundation.

  • Residencies and Studios elsewhere


    Mukherjee in england, 1978
    Through residencies like at the Kasauli Art Centre, or abroad at the West Surrey College of Art and Design or at Oxford's Museum of Modern Art, and later twice at the European Ceramic Workcentre (EKWC) in the Netherlands, Mrinalini Mukherjee’s practice extended well beyond Delhi’s studio ecology. In these transitory and often makeshift spaces, she engaged with unfamiliar materials, refined new techniques, and responded to shifting cultural landscapes. What emerges from the archives are fragments that reveal just how porous the boundaries were between travel, collaboration, and studio practice for Mukherjee during these residencies.

    Residencies often provide artists with dedicated time, space, and resources to experiment, reflect, and develop their practice outside the demands of their usual environments. For Mukherjee, they became sites of both possibility and constraint. While some offered access to new tools and scales, others required her to improvise in response to material scarcity.

     
     
    At the West Surrey College of Art and Design, for instance, Mukherjee struggled to find the quality ropes she was accustomed to in Delhi. In response, she began binding rope and long sticks; a solution shaped by necessity, but driven by her instinct for form. In contrast, her time at EKWC opened up the possibility of working at a scale she could not access at home. The state-of-the-art ceramic facilities allowed her to create ambitious, large-scale pieces that explored volume and texture with newfound freedom. However, such experiments proved difficult to sustain back in India, due to the absence of high-quality clay and kiln infrastructure.
     
    Despite these limitations, each residency added a new dimension to her evolving vocabulary showing how moments of adaptation, constraint, and discovery shaped her engagement with scale, form, and material possibilities.
  • West Surrey Days
    • Mukherjee in her studio during her British Council Scholarship at the West Surrey College of Art and Design, 1978. She used this opportunity to travel within Europe and build lifelong connections.

      Mukherjee in her studio during her British Council Scholarship at the West Surrey College of Art and Design, 1978. She used this opportunity to travel within Europe and build lifelong connections.

    • In the absence of the quality ropes she was used to in Delhi, Mukherjee began experimenting by binding rope and long sticks—an improvisation shaped by context. Sample of the works she created during her time in England.

      In the absence of the quality ropes she was used to in Delhi, Mukherjee began experimenting by binding rope and long sticks—an improvisation shaped by context. Sample of the works she created during her time in England.

  • Sanskriti Studio Sessions
    • In 1995, Mukherjee participated in a ceramic workshop at Sanskriti Kendra, part of an Indo-Dutch collaboration that brought together Indian and Dutch artists at Anandgram, then on the outskirts of Delhi.

      In 1995, Mukherjee participated in a ceramic workshop at Sanskriti Kendra, part of an Indo-Dutch collaboration that brought together Indian and Dutch artists at Anandgram, then on the outskirts of Delhi.

    • Mukherjee's first experiments with clay, shifting away from fiber toward a new medium that demanded a different kind of process and material sensitivity. Photo credit: Ranjit Singh

      Mukherjee's first experiments with clay, shifting away from fiber toward a new medium that demanded a different kind of process and material sensitivity. Photo credit: Ranjit Singh

    • Wood-fired kilns at Sanskriti Kendra.

      Wood-fired kilns at Sanskriti Kendra.

    • This work would later be exhibited in The Other Self at the National Gallery of Modern Art, with other works like Snake Column I and II and Torso II (1995). Photo credit: Akio Takamori.

      This work would later be exhibited in The Other Self at the National Gallery of Modern Art, with other works like Snake Column I and II and Torso II (1995). Photo credit: Akio Takamori.

    • Lotus Pond (1995), a sprawling composition of thirteen terracotta forms, was produced during this period.

      Lotus Pond (1995), a sprawling composition of thirteen terracotta forms, was produced during this period.

    • Lotus Pond in shifting earth tones, achieved by the degree of of firing.

      Lotus Pond in shifting earth tones, achieved by the degree of of firing.

    • The work eventually travelled to the Stedelijk Museum Amsterdam. Photo credit: Akio Takamori.

      The work eventually travelled to the Stedelijk Museum Amsterdam. Photo credit: Akio Takamori.

  • Snapshots from the Kasauli Art Centre, 1977
    • Mrinalnin seen working on Wood Spirit with artist Chandrakhant Bhatt.

      Mrinalnin seen working on Wood Spirit with artist Chandrakhant Bhatt.

    • Kasauli Art Centre, founded by Vivan Sundaram in 1976, brought together artists, critics, and performers in a close-knit creative environment. These photographs, taken by Sundaram in 1977, captured Mukherjee surrounded by nature and a shared artistic community when she was a part of the second Kasauli Art Centre Artist Workshop.

      Kasauli Art Centre, founded by Vivan Sundaram in 1976, brought together artists, critics, and performers in a close-knit creative environment. These photographs, taken by Sundaram in 1977, captured Mukherjee surrounded by nature and a shared artistic community when she was a part of the second Kasauli Art Centre Artist Workshop.

    • Mrinalini Mukherjee with few other artists participating in the Kasauli Art Centre Artist Workshop, 1977. Artists in this edition included Nagji Patel, Bhupen Khakhar, D.L.N. Reddy, Chandrakant Bhatt, Mrinalini Mukherjee, Amitava Das, Jogen Chowdhury, and A. Ramachandran.

      Mrinalini Mukherjee with few other artists participating in the Kasauli Art Centre Artist Workshop, 1977. 
      Artists in this edition included Nagji Patel, Bhupen Khakhar, D.L.N. Reddy, Chandrakant Bhatt, Mrinalini Mukherjee, Amitava Das, Jogen Chowdhury, and A. Ramachandran.

    • Mukherjee in a light, almost playful mode posing with a sculpture by Nagji Patel, in the hillside studio in Kasauli far removed from her Delhi routine and setting. All photos © Vivan Sundaram, image courtesy of Asia Art Archive.

      Mukherjee in a light, almost playful mode posing with a sculpture by Nagji Patel, in the hillside studio in Kasauli far removed from her Delhi routine and setting. All photos © Vivan Sundaram, image courtesy of Asia Art Archive.

  • Notes from Netherlands
    • European Ceramic Work Centre (EKWC), where Mukherjee was in residence in 1996 and again in 2000, is an international hub for artists, designers, and architects exploring ceramics, often for the first time. With access to advanced facilities and technical support, it offered Mukherjee the freedom to experiment and expand her sculptural prowess in clay. Photo credits: Anne Maria Borsboom.

      European Ceramic Work Centre (EKWC), where Mukherjee was in residence in 1996 and again in 2000, is an international hub for artists, designers, and architects exploring ceramics, often for the first time. With access to advanced facilities and technical support, it offered Mukherjee the freedom to experiment and expand her sculptural prowess in clay. Photo credits: Anne Maria Borsboom.

    • Work in process of getting fired in a kiln.

      Work in process of getting fired in a kiln.

    • Photo credits: Anne Maria Borsboom.

      Photo credits: Anne Maria Borsboom.

    • Photo credits: Anne Maria Borsboom.

      Photo credits: Anne Maria Borsboom.

    • Caught in media res. Photo credits: Anne Maria Borsboom.

      Caught in media res. Photo credits: Anne Maria Borsboom.

    • Photo credits: Anne Maria Borsboom.

      Photo credits: Anne Maria Borsboom.

    • Ranjit Singh in the backgrounds of the studio. Photo credits: Anne Maria Borsboom.

      Ranjit Singh in the backgrounds of the studio. Photo credits: Anne Maria Borsboom.

    • Installation view of Ceramic works at EKWC. Photo credits: Anne Maria Borsboom.

      Installation view of Ceramic works at EKWC. Photo credits: Anne Maria Borsboom.

    • A moment from the studio at EKWC. Photo credits: Anne Maria Borsboom.

      A moment from the studio at EKWC. Photo credits: Anne Maria Borsboom.

    • Mukherjee is seen working alongside her husband, architect Ranjit Singh, who assisted her. Photo credits: Anne Maria Borsboom.

      Mukherjee is seen working alongside her husband, architect Ranjit Singh, who assisted her. Photo credits: Anne Maria Borsboom.

    • Photo credits: Anne Maria Borsboom.

      Photo credits: Anne Maria Borsboom.

    • Brochure from 1996, an ephemera from Mukherjee’s residency at EKWC.

      Brochure from 1996, an ephemera from Mukherjee’s residency at EKWC.

  • How to place an artist beyond the physical mapping of their studio? 

    Where does a practice begin or end when it travels across cities, materials, relationships, and decades? 
    What can the remains of a studio—photograph slides, negatives, contact sheets, letters, and lists—tell us about a process that was never fully visible to begin with?

    What if the archive becomes a studio of its own—where process continues not through making,but through remembering, reframing, and re-reading what was left behind?

  • With Studio Practice, we enter the archives not only to trace the sites of Mukherjee’s practice, but to ask what a studio means when it exceeds walls and physical spaces.

     

    This exhibition, the first of many, becomes a way of moving with her through the places she worked, the artists she encountered, the residencies and institutions she engaged with, and the works that emerged in between. In doing so, we begin to see the archive not as a site of retrospection, but as a space of return where process, memory, and material remain active, and where Mukherjee’s legacy continues to unfold, shaped as much by her world as by those who now encounter it anew.

     

  • References
    Shanay Jhaveri, Phenomenal Forces of Nature, in Mrinalini Mukherjee (The Shoestring Publisher, 2019).
    Nilima Sheikh, Ruse for Wonderment, in Transfigurations: The Sculpture of Mrinalini Mukherjee (Archana Press, 2017).
    The Andy Warhol Museum, “Time Capsule 21: Artwork,” 2003, https://www.warhol.org/timecapsule/andy-warhols-time-capsule-21/time-capsule-21-artwork
     
    Curatorial text by Haifa Maryam, with inputs from Bhooma Padmanabhan and Sheila Makhijani.


    All images, videos, text, data and material (hereafter "content") on this site are protected by copyright. Mrinalini Mukherjee Foundation has taken all efforts to identify and state the name of the author of said content, or institution to whom the content belongs. Mrinalini Mukherjee Foundation and relevant third parties, own and expressly reserve all rights, including copyright, in whole and in part, throughout the world, for the contents on this website. 
    Copying, distributing, modifying, transmitting, reusing, downloading, or using the contents of the site without the express prior written permission of the Mrinalini Mukherjee Foundations could be a violation of copyright laws. 

     

    To obtain permission for use of content from the site (i.e. images, text, video and/or data) please write to us at info@mrinalinimukherjeefoundation.org


     © All rights reserved. Images and archival material remain the property of their respective photographers and copyright holders. This content is intended for educational and non-commercial use only. No part of this material may be reproduced, stored, or transmitted in any form without prior permission from the Mrinalini Mukherjee Foundation.
  • In the coming days, Mrinalini Mukherjee Foundation will continue to revisit and expand upon these threads through public programs, conversations, and workshops. Stay tuned for updates.
Manage cookies
Copyright © #2024# MRINALINI MUKHERJEE FOUNDATION
Site by Artlogic

Registered Address:   C/7 Rashmi Cooperative Housing Society,

11 Byramji Gamadia Road, Carmichael Road, Mumbai 400 026, India

Office Address:  F-213 A, III Floor, Lado Sarai, New Delhi 110030, India

General Enquiries:   info@mrinalinimukherjeefoundation.org 

Facebook, opens in a new tab.
Instagram, opens in a new tab.
Join the mailing list
Send an email
View on Google Maps

This website uses cookies
This site uses cookies to help make it more useful to you. Please contact us to find out more about our Cookie Policy.

Manage cookies
Accept

Cookie preferences

Check the boxes for the cookie categories you allow our site to use

Cookie options
Required for the website to function and cannot be disabled.
Improve your experience on the website by storing choices you make about how it should function.
Allow us to collect anonymous usage data in order to improve the experience on our website.
Allow us to identify our visitors so that we can offer personalised, targeted marketing.
Save preferences
Close

Join our mailing list

Signup

* denotes required fields

We will process the personal data you have supplied in accordance with our privacy policy (available on request). You can unsubscribe or change your preferences at any time by clicking the link in our emails.